<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blue Anorak &#187; Films</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shrimper.org.uk/category/culture/films/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shrimper.org.uk</link>
	<description>Ponderings of an Essex boy exiled in Lancashire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 20:18:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bond buffoonery</title>
		<link>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/culture/films/2007/03/17/bond-buffoonery</link>
		<comments>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/culture/films/2007/03/17/bond-buffoonery#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 11:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Films]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shrimper.org.uk/culture/films/2007/03/17/bond-buffoonery/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tomorrow is Mother&#8217;s Day. Many women find Daniel Craig rather tasty. Mothers tend to be female. So, Sony Pictures are releasing Casino Royale on Monday. Clever.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tomorrow is Mother&#8217;s Day.</p>
<p>Many women find Daniel Craig rather tasty.</p>
<p>Mothers tend to be female.</p>
<p>So, Sony Pictures are releasing Casino Royale on Monday.</p>
<p>Clever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/culture/films/2007/03/17/bond-buffoonery/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Shadows? On my lungs?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/culture/films/2007/02/12/shadows-on-my-lungs</link>
		<comments>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/culture/films/2007/02/12/shadows-on-my-lungs#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 22:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shrimper.org.uk/culture/films/2007/02/12/shadows-on-my-lungs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Oh God in heaven help me,&#8221; and other quotes from British films of yesteryear featured in popular music of the last twenty years over on my last.fm journal.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.last.fm/user/longwayround/journal/2007/02/12/342875/">&#8220;Oh God in heaven help me,&#8221;</a> and other quotes  from British films of yesteryear featured in popular music of the last twenty years over on my last.fm journal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/culture/films/2007/02/12/shadows-on-my-lungs/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HD-DVD vs. Blu-ray: customers to be screwed</title>
		<link>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/culture/2006/02/24/hd-dvd-vs-blu-ray-customers-to-be-screwed</link>
		<comments>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/culture/2006/02/24/hd-dvd-vs-blu-ray-customers-to-be-screwed#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 20:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cpanel-02.portlandx.com/~shrimper/?p=124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I should have known that there was more to the HD-DVD / Blu-ray debate than meets the eye. Increasingly, it&#8217;s becoming clear that the media industry is hell-bent on alienating its customers. Now I&#8217;m beginning to learn that the real idea behind these two new media is not to allow customers access to higher quality [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should have known that there was more to the HD-DVD / Blu-ray debate than meets the eye. Increasingly, it&#8217;s becoming clear that the media industry is hell-bent on alienating its customers. Now I&#8217;m beginning to learn that the real idea behind these two new media is not to allow customers access to higher quality video at all: indeed, we could find that we buy a disc and then are allowed to view it just a couple of times. And I thought the Napster subscription service was a crap idea.
</p>
<p><a href="http://intelligentassistance.com/blog/2005/10/21/31/">The present and future of post production business and technology &raquo; When a good format &ldquo;wins&rdquo; for all the wrong reasons</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Although I&rsquo;m definitely in the group of people that sees Blu-ray as the undoubtedly superior technology of the two high density optical disc competitors, and should be happy that the tide seems to be turning toward Blu-ray &lsquo;winning&rsquo; the war before a shot is fired or product released, it seems the reason Paramount and Warner Bros &lsquo;defected&rsquo; to Blu-ray was because of the Digital Rights Management (DRM) supported in that format is much more restrictive than for HD DVD.</p>
<p>Both formats support Advanced Access Content System (AACS) as the primary DRM and Blu-ray has two additional DRM control agents included. However the point of difference, and the reason Bill Gates said Blu-ray was &lsquo;anti consumer&rsquo; is because HD DVD mandates that all discs support Managed Copy, while Blu-ray leaves the option to activate Managed Copy to individual disc authors &#8220;</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/culture/2006/02/24/hd-dvd-vs-blu-ray-customers-to-be-screwed/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another example of corporate disrespect</title>
		<link>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/culture/2005/12/24/another-example-of-corporate-disrespect</link>
		<comments>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/culture/2005/12/24/another-example-of-corporate-disrespect#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cpanel-02.portlandx.com/~shrimper/?p=99</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday morning, I thought I would let my daughter (2) watch &#8220;Shrek 2&#8221; Why is that DVD makers make it so time-consuming to play the blasted film? You can&#8217;t just slap in the DVD, press play and walk away. You have to wait while it plays some stupid THX introduction, and a few corporate logos, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday morning, I thought I would let my daughter (2) watch &#8220;<a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0002VE5GW/qid=1135325074/fulwoodmethodist">Shrek 2</a>&#8221; Why is that DVD makers make it so time-consuming to play the blasted film? You can&#8217;t just slap in the DVD, press play and walk away. You have to wait while it plays some stupid THX introduction, and a few corporate logos, then an obscenely long trailer for a different film, several seconds of animation to display a menu so you can finally select Play. By this time <strong>I</strong> am bored with waiting, let alone my daughter who now wants to watch <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/cbeebies/">Beebies</a>.</p>
<p>Why can I not just watch the bloody things I&#8217;ve paid for on whatever machine I want in whatever country I happen to be in at the time?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s my time, my DVD player and my DVD.  I possess some DVDs where I can&#8217;t even fast forward through the junk and am expected to read copyright information in English (for the UK); Swedish; Bulgarian; English (for Australia); French (for France); English (for New Zealand); Estonian; French (for Switzerland)&#8230;</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t help wondering whether this sort of corporate disrespect for customers just encourages piracy. After all, if I were to make a copy of this DVD for someone then I would certainly not oblige them to watch anything. And if I knew anyone who could make copies of DVDs then I would be asking them to create user-friendly versions of some of mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/culture/2005/12/24/another-example-of-corporate-disrespect/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DVDs</title>
		<link>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/culture/2005/08/25/dvds</link>
		<comments>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/culture/2005/08/25/dvds#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2005 09:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Films]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cpanel-02.portlandx.com/~shrimper/?p=22</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been rather a fan of films and, more particularly, the cinema for longer than I can really remember. When I bought my OnDigital box (back in the days when the things cost something like &#163;250!) the clincher was FilmFour, a channel which promised a wide variety of English-language and foreign-language films. Sadly, we never [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been rather a fan of films and, more particularly, the cinema for longer than I can really remember. When I bought my OnDigital box (back in the days when the things cost something like &pound;250!) the clincher was <a href="http://www.filmfour.com/">FilmFour</a>, a channel which promised a wide variety of English-language and foreign-language films.</p>
<p>Sadly, we never really watched as many of the films as we wanted since too many of the films began just as we were going to bed. There are only so many times that a person can watch <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00004CX4M/1485">The Quick and the Dead</a> before beginning to question whether they are reaping the full benefit of their subscription.</p>
<p>Since the beginning of this year, we have been members of the <a href="http://www.lovefilm.com/">LoveFilm</a> online DVD rental service. We find this vastly better than both FilmFour, since we can watch a DVD pretty much whenever we want and don&#8217;t face the irritation of finding, as is typical with a certain national chain of video shops, that the film we want is not available, but we could rent as many as fifty copies of <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00004CZNZ/1485">There&#8217;s Something About Mary</a>.</p>
<p>LoveFilm&#8217;s range is truly immense&mdash; I&#8217;ve yet to find a DVD that has been released and is not in their range. I actually suspect that, were I to try to rent such a thing, they would send someone down to the shops to buy it for me. On average, the DVD arrives within two working days of us posting the previous disc. We have watched more <em>good</em> films this year than in our previous six as FilmFour subscribers (ten as members of Blockbuster). We are more willing to take a risk with a film this way: for instance, we recently watched the first part of <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/B000284A56/1485">Heimat</a>: a tremendous German-language programme that we would never have been able to rent locally and wouldn&#8217;t consider buying just on the off-chance that all the reviews were right. Tonight, we shall be mostly watching the final episodes of Krzystof Kieslowski&#8217;s <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00005V4UG/1485">Dekalog</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/culture/2005/08/25/dvds/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
