<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blue Anorak &#187; The Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shrimper.org.uk/category/web/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shrimper.org.uk</link>
	<description>Ponderings of an Essex boy exiled in Lancashire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 20:18:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>At last, Twitter meets Facebook</title>
		<link>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/web/twitter/2007/10/11/at-last-twitter-meets-facebook</link>
		<comments>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/web/twitter/2007/10/11/at-last-twitter-meets-facebook#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paderborn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southend United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[text]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weather]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shrimper.org.uk/twitter/2007/10/11/at-last-twitter-meets-facebook</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following on from my discovery a couple of days ago that the Twitter app now can update my Facebook status, I&#8217;ve been wondering about how I can keep up to date with people&#8217;s Facebook updates while I&#8217;m away. Using twitterfeed I have directed a couple of feeds for my own private use to the user [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following on from my discovery a couple of days ago that the Twitter app now can update my Facebook status, I&#8217;ve been wondering about how I can keep up to date with people&#8217;s Facebook updates <a href="/?p=284#perils">while I&#8217;m away</a>.</p>
<p>Using <a href="http://twitterfeed.com/">twitterfeed</a> I have directed a couple of feeds <span id="more-284"></span>for my own private use to the user <a href="http://twitter.com/longwayroundfb">longwayroundfb</a>. One of those is my Facebook Friends&#8217; status updates, the other is the <a href="http://feeds.bbc.co.uk/weather/feeds/rss/5day/world/4735.xml">BBC&#8217;s weather forecast for Paderborn-Lippstadt International airport</a>.</p>
<p>Of more potential use to others is the <a href="http://twitter.com/BBCsouthend">BBC&#8217;s Southend United news feed</a> which I&#8217;ve set up having become bored of Virgin Mobile&#8217;s failure to send me the score updates that they had previously sent to me.</p>
<p><a name="perils"><sup>1</sup></a>(It&#8217;s one of the perils of being a languages teacher that now and then I can be dragged unceremoniously away from the classroom to <del>spend an inordinate amount of time in German bars</del> accompany students on educational visits.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/web/twitter/2007/10/11/at-last-twitter-meets-facebook/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>At last, Facebook meets Twitter</title>
		<link>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/web/2007/10/09/at-last-facebook-meets-twitter</link>
		<comments>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/web/2007/10/09/at-last-facebook-meets-twitter#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 20:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[istalkr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shrimper.org.uk/web/2007/10/09/at-last-facebook-meets-twitter</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It appears that it is finally possible to use Twitter to change one&#8217;s status on Facebook. I love Twitter. With its mobile phone integration, it&#8217;s a fantastic means of keeping close friends up-to-date with one&#8217;s activities. With Facebook&#8217;s continuing failure to open up their mobile service within the UK, there may finally be more than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears that it is finally possible to use Twitter to change one&#8217;s status on <a href="http://www.facebook.com/">Facebook</a>. I love <a href="http://twitter.com/longwayround/with_friends">Twitter</a>. With its mobile phone integration, it&#8217;s a fantastic means of keeping close friends up-to-date with one&#8217;s activities. With Facebook&#8217;s continuing failure to open up their mobile service within the UK, there may finally be more than three people to read my idle Twitterings.</p>
<p>Tonight <a href='http://www.shrimper.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/istalkr.png'><img align='left' src='http://www.shrimper.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/istalkr.thumbnail.png' alt='iStalkr: a social feed aggregator' /></a>I have also discovered <a href="http://www.istalkr.com/users/longwayround">iStalkr</a>, a <q>social feed aggregator</q>. I&#8217;m less convinced by the need for this one but I shall follow it with a little interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/web/2007/10/09/at-last-facebook-meets-twitter/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BBpress guide</title>
		<link>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/web/wordpress/2006/10/29/bbpress-guide</link>
		<comments>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/web/wordpress/2006/10/29/bbpress-guide#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 13:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cpanel-02.portlandx.com/~shrimper/?p=193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is now a guide to customising BBpress over on Devlounge. This could prove handy now that I&#8217;ve started to trial BBpress on the Fulwood Methodist Church site. I have found that this forum software integrates very nicely with WordPress but the default template is, in my opinion, an awful mess of tiny fonts (&#8216;font-size: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is now <a href="http://www.devlounge.net/articles/the-ultimate-bbpress-guide/">a guide to customising BBpress over on Devlounge</a>. This could prove handy now that I&#8217;ve started to trial <a href="http://www.bbpress.org/">BBpress</a> on the <a href="http://www.fulwood.org.uk/wp/fora/">Fulwood Methodist Church</a> site.</p>
<p>I have found that this forum software integrates very nicely with <a href="http://wordpress.org/">WordPress</a> but the default template is, in my opinion, an awful mess of tiny fonts (&#8216;<code>font-size: 62.5%</code>&#8216;!) and impenetrable <code>DIV</code>s.</p>
<p>I had made some progress with integrating the design of the fora with that of the rest of the site. Then, I installed BBpress 0.74 over <abbr title="version">v</abbr>0.73 and, being a bit dim, lost the changes I had made.</p>
<p>I think the principle benefit of having a forum at the moment is that it presents a less intimidating interface than WordPress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/web/wordpress/2006/10/29/bbpress-guide/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Click to enter this site&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/web/2006/10/26/click-to-enter-this-site</link>
		<comments>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/web/2006/10/26/click-to-enter-this-site#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 14:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cpanel-02.portlandx.com/~shrimper/?p=192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s almost as annoying as pop-up windows and websites on which music plays as soon as the page loads: the message. Folks, if I didn&#8217;t want to enter the site then I wouldn&#8217;t have steered my browser in your direction. At the very least, if you must give me a &#8216;snazzy&#8217; front page then give [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s almost as annoying as pop-up windows and websites on which music plays as soon as the page loads: the <img id="image208" src="http://ccgi.bosman.plus.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/10/clickToEnter.thumbnail.png" alt="click to enter" /> message. Folks, if I didn&#8217;t want to enter the site then I wouldn&#8217;t have steered my browser in your direction. At the very least, if you must give me a &#8216;snazzy&#8217; front page then give me some more navigational options. However, the whole concept demonstrates a pathetic misunderstanding of the concept of a website: there is no front page. Visitors will enter through whichever page the referring site chose to link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/web/2006/10/26/click-to-enter-this-site/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Better Than We Know Ourselves</title>
		<link>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/culture/music/2006/09/21/better-than-we-know-ourselves</link>
		<comments>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/culture/music/2006/09/21/better-than-we-know-ourselves#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 20:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cpanel-02.portlandx.com/~shrimper/?p=176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Below is an extract from a fascinating article about Last.fm and its ilk. I&#8217;m now having a look at the MusicIP mixer. Or is it looking at me? Pitchfork Feature: Better Than We Know Ourselves &#8220;Music is tribal in its essence&#8221; Much like Ringo more than a decade ago, Last.fm— which launched in its present [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Below is an extract from a fascinating article about Last.fm and its ilk. I&#8217;m now having a look at the MusicIP mixer.</p>
<p>Or is it looking at me?</p>
<p><a href="http://ccgi.bosman.plus.com/%5C%22http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/article/feature/36524/Better_Than_We_Know_Ourselves%5C%22">Pitchfork Feature: Better Than We Know Ourselves</a></p>
<h3>&#8220;Music is tribal in its essence&#8221;</h3>
<p>Much like Ringo more than a decade ago, Last.fm— which launched in its present form in August 2005&#8211; recommends music by comparing you to everybody else in the system, and it builds a community where you can find other fans who share your tastes. But unlike Ringo, it doesn\&#8217;t study you through a questionnaire: You give it permission to spy on you and learn everything it can based on the music you play on your computer.</p>
<p>As co-founder Martin Stiksel explains on the phone from their London office, &#8220;Last.fm developed out of a platform for unsigned artists and bands. Two of the founders, Felix [Miller] and myself, had an online label/unsigned artist platform on our website, [along with] streaming radio. And we were inundated with great music. Within a short time we had 500 different artists that nobody knew.&#8221;</p>
<p>So they built a collaborative filtering system— a tool that makes recommendations based on the fans who most closely share your tastes. Put simply, if your collection and somebody else&#8217;s are 80% alike, it&#8217;s a safe bet you would like the other 20%. Once the system gets a read on you, it uses this formula to recommend bands, point you to your &#8220;neighbours&#8221;— other users with similar listening habits— and stream a custom-tailored radio station to your Last.fm music player.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/culture/music/2006/09/21/better-than-we-know-ourselves/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No football for Mac users</title>
		<link>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/technology/apple-mac/2006/09/21/no-football-for-mac-users</link>
		<comments>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/technology/apple-mac/2006/09/21/no-football-for-mac-users#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 19:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southend United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cpanel-02.portlandx.com/~shrimper/?p=174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For several years now, the Football League have been offering commentary on games over the internet. I have been a subscriber to this service for a few years now and have truly enjoyed the service, despite its faults. Sadly, the operators of the service, PremiumTV appear to have little or no knowledge of reality. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For several years now, the Football League have been offering commentary on games over the internet. I have been a subscriber to this service for a few years now and have truly enjoyed the service, despite its faults.</p>
<p>Sadly, the operators of the service, PremiumTV appear to have little or no knowledge of reality. The service for which I pay allows me to receive a 16 <abbr title="kilobit per second">kbps</abbr> stream of BBC Essex commentary on Southend United games. The service is ropey in that the link is frequently lost but there is no other practical way for exiled football supporters to follow many of their clubs&#8217; games.</p>
<p>Now, however, I find that PremiumTV are changing the system. Currently it can be accessed using almost any web browser and Windows Media Player 9 using the ACELP codec. In the future, however, the system will move to <abbr title="Windows Media Player">WMP</abbr>10&#8242;s <abbr title="digital rights management">DRM</abbr> system, compatible only with Windows.</p>
<p>For music sales, I am in many ways ambivalent about DRM. I have bought a good number of tracks from the <a href="http://www.apple.com/uk/itunes/store/">iTunes</a> store and rarely ever now buy a physical single. However, this is for a 128kbps recording. I honestly struggle to believe that PremiumTV will do anything to protect their market by moving into DRM to protect a 16kbps audio stream, a bitrate which is in quality terms roughly halfway between a telephone call and medium-wave radio.</p>
<p>I remain optimistic that the company may see sense. For what it&#8217;s worth, I have contacted the Football League, Southend United <abbr title="football club">F.C.</abbr> and the <a title="Southend United Supporters Club Trust" href="http://www.shrimperstrust.co.uk">SUSCT</a>.</p>
<p>Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Football" rel="tag">Football</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/League" rel="tag">League</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/PremiumTV" rel="tag">PremiumTV</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Windows+Media+Player" rel="tag">Windows Media Player</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/ACELP" rel="tag">ACELP</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/DRM" rel="tag">DRM</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/technology/apple-mac/2006/09/21/no-football-for-mac-users/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>eMusic</title>
		<link>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/culture/music/2006/09/13/emusic</link>
		<comments>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/culture/music/2006/09/13/emusic#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 19:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cpanel-02.portlandx.com/~shrimper/?p=166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s been a lot of guff in the press lately about eMusic who have, apparently, just launched their UK arm. I describe this as guff since I remember using their free trial some time ago to download albums by Cocteau Twins, the Pixies and Madder Rose. Today, I downloaded another 25 tracks using their free [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s been a lot of guff in the press lately about eMusic who have, apparently, just launched their UK arm.</p>
<p>I describe this as guff since I remember using their free trial some time ago to download albums by Cocteau Twins, the Pixies and Madder Rose. Today, I downloaded another 25 tracks using their free trial. It would appear that, so long as the card number is different each time, users can have as many free trials as they like.</p>
<p>Thanks eMusic for Franz Ferdinand&#8216;s &#8220;You Could Have It So Much Better&#8221;, the Cocteau Twins&#8217; &#8220;Treasure&#8221; and The Fall&#8216;s &#8220;Totally Wired&#8221;.</p>
<p>The range of music on eMusic is not at all bad, unless your musical interests are mainstream but a subscription service really would not be my cup of tea.</p>
<p>Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/eMusic" rel="tag">eMusic</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Cocteau+Twins" rel="tag">Cocteau Twins</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Pixies" rel="tag">Pixies</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Madder+Rose" rel="tag">Madder Rose</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Franz+Ferdinand" rel="tag">Franz Ferdinand</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/The+Fall" rel="tag">The Fall</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/culture/music/2006/09/13/emusic/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dictator of the Month/ Diktator des Monates, presenting dictators of the world since 1900</title>
		<link>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/politics/2006/05/31/dictator-of-the-month-diktator-des-monates-presenting-dictators-of-the-world-since-1900</link>
		<comments>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/politics/2006/05/31/dictator-of-the-month-diktator-des-monates-presenting-dictators-of-the-world-since-1900#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 08:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cpanel-02.portlandx.com/~shrimper/?p=147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For future browsing&#8230; Dictator of the Month/ Diktator des Monates, presenting dictators of the world since 1900]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For future browsing&#8230; <a href="http://www.dictatorofthemonth.com/">Dictator of the Month/ Diktator des Monates, presenting dictators of the world since 1900</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/politics/2006/05/31/dictator-of-the-month-diktator-des-monates-presenting-dictators-of-the-world-since-1900/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Church Marketing Sucks: Web 2.0 Series Wrap-Up</title>
		<link>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/christianity/2006/05/21/church-marketing-sucks-web-20-series-wrap-up</link>
		<comments>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/christianity/2006/05/21/church-marketing-sucks-web-20-series-wrap-up#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 May 2006 13:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cpanel-02.portlandx.com/~shrimper/?p=143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Church Marketing Sucks: Web 2.0 Series Wrap-Up is the last in a fine, thought-provoking series of articles which more churches could benefit from reading. As stated elsewhere on that site, there are risks involved. But then, isn&#8217;t God our shield? For the past month and a half we&#8217;ve been looking at the web 2.0 trend [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2006/05/web_20_series_w.html">Church Marketing Sucks: Web 2.0 Series Wrap-Up</a> is the last in a fine, thought-provoking series of articles which more churches could benefit from reading. As stated elsewhere on that site, there are risks involved. But then, isn&#8217;t God our shield?</p>
<blockquote><p>For the past month and a half we&#8217;ve been looking at the web 2.0 trend and what it could mean for your church. We&#8217;ve looked at the highs and lows, the possibilities and the dangers and whether or not any of it means anything for telling more people about Jesus.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/christianity/2006/05/21/church-marketing-sucks-web-20-series-wrap-up/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Irritation</title>
		<link>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/work/2006/04/07/irritation</link>
		<comments>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/work/2006/04/07/irritation#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 17:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cpanel-02.portlandx.com/~shrimper/?p=138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My school has set up a number of blogs. I think this is a fantastic idea and should motivate many of our students. It&#8217;s just a pity that one or two members of staff seem intent on sabotaging the idea.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My school has set up a number of blogs. I think this is a fantastic idea and should motivate many of our students. It&#8217;s just a pity that one or two members of staff seem intent on sabotaging the idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.shrimper.org.uk/work/2006/04/07/irritation/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
